The program is based on a Best Practices Model that prioritizes public safety and incorporates the latest evaluation tools, treatment methodologies and behavioral management systems based on current research. The program is consistent with the mission of the Department of Juvenile Justice which is to protect the public through a balanced approach of comprehensive services that prevent and reduce juvenile delinquency through partnerships with families, schools, communities, law enforcement and other agencies, while providing the opportunity for delinquent youth to develop into responsible and productive citizens. Program Components Assessment and Treatment Individualized treatment plans are designed to increase family functioning, increase victim empathy skills, social competencies, offender accountability and to recognize positive progress. An interagency multi-disciplinary team oversees treatment planning and provides funding through local Family Planning and Assessment Team and Transitional Services funding for youth on parole. All referred clients are initially evaluated using an integrated psychosexual assessment.
The Effective Treatment of Juveniles Who Sexually Offend
Practice: Juvenile Sex Offender Treatment - almostcured.com
Contributor Information. Inquiries should be addressed to Elizabeth J. See other articles in PMC that cite the published article. Abstract This article raises serious concerns regarding the widespread use of unproven interventions with juveniles who sexually offend and suggests innovative methods for addressing these concerns.
Juveniles are different than adult offenders in many ways, and we have learned that the key to success in representing those clients is to understand their needs and find appropriate solutions based on the particular juvenile we are working with. Sex offender treatment is one of the most effective ways to help a juvenile end a pattern of destructive behavior, and we are very experienced in finding the appropriate evaluator and treatment provider for our clients. Juvenile Sex Offenders are Different from Adults.
The analysis by Worling, Littlejohn, and Bookalam mirrored Worling and Curwen's original investigation in the following ways. First, recidivism was examined using charges for sexual, nonsexual violent, nonviolent, and any new offense. Second, comparison group subjects consisted of three subgroups: